蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 6177|回复: 24
收起左侧

[规章制度] FDA2018年发布的典型的数据完整性缺陷汇总

  [复制链接]
药徒
发表于 2018-5-22 09:07:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
序号:1
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,批记录
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180409
  企业名称:英国McCallum Manufacturing Ltd.
  缺陷项描述:
Your firm failed to prepare batch production and control records with  complete information relating to the production and control of each batch of  drug product produced (21 CFR211.188).
  你公司未制订批生产和检验记录,来记录所生产的每批药品的完整生产和检验信息(21 CFR 211.188)。
Your production and control records did not define and document process  parameters to ensure that in-process materials and your finished drug products  meet quality requirements. For instance, your batch records did not include  information such as identity of the equipment, actual (b)(4)time, temperature,  filling and packaging operation steps, and yield percentage specifications.
  你们的生产和检测记录未定义并记录工艺参数,以确保中间体和成品符合质量要求。例如,你们的批记录并未包括如设备识别信息、实际XX时长、温度、灌装和包装操作步骤以及收率百分比标准。

  序号:2
  缺陷项关键词:数据可靠性,检测数据
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180315
  企业名称:印度Keshava Organics Pvt. Ltd
  缺陷项描述:
Failure to maintain complete laboratory control records for test  methods.
  未能保存完整的实验室检验方法记录。
In several instances, you failed to maintain complete data for API tested  and distributed to the U.S. For example, we found test data sheets with missing  sample weights for identity testing, batch/lot numbers for reference standards  and reagents, equipment identification, and complete thin layer chromatography  data for related compounds.
  在数个事例中,你们未能保存销往美国的API的完整检测数据。例如,我们发现检验数据表缺失了鉴别测试中的样品重量、对照品和试剂的批号、仪器编号,有关物质的完整TLC数据。

  序号:3
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,检测记录
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180309
  企业名称:米尼加Labocont Industrial SRL 20180309
  缺陷型项描述:
Your firm failed to ensure that laboratory records included complete data  derived from all tests necessary to assure compliance with established  specifications and standards (21 CFR 211.194(a)).
  你们公司未能确保实验室记录包括为确保符合既定质量标准所必须的所有检测项的完整数据(21 CFR211.194(a))。
Your firm does not ensure that complete data from assay testing of your  finished drug products and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are  maintained and reviewed by your quality unit. For example, our investigator  observed that an analyst failed to document absorbance data generated during  assay analysis, and only reported calculated results.
  你公司未能确保制剂产品和API含量的完整检测数据由你们质量部门进行保存和审核。例如,我们调查人员发现一位分析员未记录含量分析中生成的吸收数据,仅报告了计算结果。
Because you do not document and maintain complete data from your analyses,  it is not possible to evaluate whether the method was followed and data is  valid, or to substantively investigate sources of deviations and variation in  your laboratory. It is essential that all data generated during analysis is  maintained and reviewed to determine whether laboratory procedures are followed,  and raw materials and drug products conform to established specifications.
  由于你们并未记录和保存来自分析的完整数据,因此无法评估是否遵循检测方法以及数据是否有效,也无法对你们实验室内的偏差和波动来源进行实质性调查。保存分析中所生成的所有数据并进行审核对确定是否遵循了实验室室程序,确定原料和药品是否符合既定质量标准是很重要的。

  序号:4
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,检测数据
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180223
  企业名称:中国浙江绿岛科技
  缺陷项描述:
Your firm failed to ensure that laboratory records included complete data  derived from all tests necessary to assure compliance with established  specifications and standards (21 CFR 211.194(a)).
  你们公司未能确保实验室记录包括为确保符合既定质量标准所必须的所有检测项的完整数据(21 CFR211.194(a))。
Your firm lacks basic laboratory controls to prevent changes to paper and  electronic records for your over-the-counter (OTC) drug products. You were not  able to provide analytical test data for three batches of (b)(4) spray and one  batch of (b)(4).We found that you created certificates of analysis (COA) for  these four batches before they were manufactured and tested.
  你们公司缺乏基本的实验室控制来防止对OTC药品纸质和电子记录进行修改。你们无法提供3批XX喷雾剂和1批XX的分析检测数据。我们发现你们在这4批药品生产和检测之前就编制了它们的COA。
When questioned, your firm acknowledged falsifying the analytical test  results on the COA you used to support release and distribution of (b)(4) spray  and (b)(4) drug products to the United States.
  在问到你们时,你们公司告知我们你们捏造了用以支持放行和销售至美国XX喷雾剂和XX药品的COA上的分析检测结果。
In addition, we found three electronic data files in the electronic recycle  bin of the stand-alone HPLC system you used to test finished drug product (b)(4)  spray. Because this instrument lacks back-up and audit trail capabilities, we  could not determine how frequently test data obtained prior to “official” batch  testing was discarded. You were unable to explain why these electronic files  were deleted.
  此外,我们在你们用以检测成品XX喷雾剂的单机版HPLC系统的电子回收站发现3个电子数据文件。由于此仪器缺乏备份和审计追踪能力,我们无法确定你们在“正式”批检测之前弃除了多少次的检测数据。你们无法解释为什么要删除这些电子文件。
cGMP-related data must be retained by a laboratory to enable appropriate  assessments and decisions by the quality unit regarding batch disposition and to  demonstrate ongoing control.
  实验室必须保存cGMP相关的数据,供质量部门进行适当的评估和批处理决定并保证其持续受控。

  序号:5
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,伪造实验室数据
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180216
  企业名称:印度Alchymars ICM SM Private Limited
  缺陷项描述:
Failure to have laboratory control records that include complete data  derived from all laboratory tests conducted to ensure your API complies with  established specifications and standards.
  没有实验室检测记录,其中包括为确保你们API符合既定质量标准所实施的所有实验室测试所生成的完整数据。
Our investigator found that your firm was falsifying laboratory data. For  example, the number of colony-forming units (CFU) found on (b)(4) plates for  (b)(4)water point-of-use tests differed substantially from the number recorded  on your (b)(4) water report. For multiple points of use, your analyst reported  far fewer CFU than observed on the plate by our investigator. In addition, while  you reported absence of growth on a selective media plate used to detect  objectionable microorganisms, our investigator observed growth on this plate.  This is concerning because you use(b)(4) water to manufacture products, such as  (b)(4) API, that are intended for use in sterile injectable dosage forms.
  我们的调查人员发现你们公司伪造实验室数据。例如,在XX用水点检测XX碟上发现的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量与你们的XX水报告上所记录的数值有显著差异。有多个使用点,你们分析员所报告的数值都远低于我们调查人员在你们碟上看到的。另外,虽然你们报告说在一个用于检出致病菌的选择性培养基碟上未检出微生物生长,但我们调查人员却在该碟上看到了微生物生长。这种情况令人担忧,因为你们使用XX水用于例如XX原料药的生产,该原料药又将用于无菌注射制剂药品的生产。

  序号:6
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,设备维护记录
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180216
  企业名称:印度Alchymars ICM SM Private Limited
  缺陷项描述:
Failure to properly maintain equipment and to keep complete records of  major equipment maintenance.
  未能对设备进行妥善维护,并保存主要设备维护的完整记录。
Our investigator found damaged product-contact surfaces on your  multi-product equipment. For example, the man hole gasket of (b)(4)111 was  deteriorating and wrapped in peeling tape. A gasket on the (b)(4)102 was also  cracked in one area and wrapped in peeling tape.
  我们调查人员发现你们多产品生产设备与产品接触的表面受损。例如,XX111的人孔垫圈损坏,包裹在剥落的胶带中。XX102的垫圈也有一个地方裂开了,也是包裹在剥落的胶带中。
Your SOP/ENG/39-1, Gasket Management for Equipments and Pipelines which are  in Direct Contact with the Product, section 4.18, requires you to replace  gaskets in critical areas, including gaskets for (b)(4)111 and (b)(4)102,  (b)(4).Your firm was unable to provide gasket replacement records for this  equipment during the inspection.
  你们的SOP/ENG/39-1“与产品直接接触的设备和管道垫圈管理”第4.18部分要求你们对关键区域的垫圈进行更换,包括XX111和XX102的垫圈。你们公司在检查期间未能提供该设备的垫圈更换记录。
Furthermore, the most recent records of your firm checking the condition of  the gaskets for (b)(4)102were from January 2017, more than (b)(4) before our  inspection.
  还有,你们公司检查XX102垫圈情况的最近记录是从2017年1月开始的,在我们检查之前XX时长。
This is a repeat observation from our February 2015 inspection. We also  note that you have found deteriorating gaskets to be the root cause for finished  API particle complaints.
  这是2015年2月我们检查中发现的重复缺陷。我们也注意到你们已发现了老化的垫圈是成品原料药颗粒物投诉的根本原因。
Your response is inadequate. You stated that the “involved gasket was  immediately substituted” but did not evaluate all other gaskets on your  manufacturing equipment. You indicated that you will update your procedure to  require a supervisor walk-through to assess product contact surfaces, but did  not include sufficient detail (e.g. frequency of equipment inspection). You also  failed to address the lack of gasket maintenance records.
  你们的回复是不充分的。你们声称“所涉及的垫圈马上就被替换了”,但并未评估你们生产设备上所有其它垫圈。你们说你们会更新你们的程序,要求主管现场排查以评估产品接触表面,但并未包括足够详细的内容(例如,设备检查的频次)。你们也未解决缺少垫圈维护记录的问题。

  序号:7
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,伪造实验室检测数据
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180202
  企业名称:韩国Cosmecca Korea Co., Ltd.
  缺陷项描述:
Your firm failed to ensure that laboratory records included complete data  derived from all tests necessary to assure compliance with established  specifications and standards (21 CFR 211.194(a)).
  你们公司未能确保实验室记录包括为确保符合既定质量标准所必须的所有检测项的完整数据(21 CFR211.194(a))。
Our investigator documented multiple examples of falsifying laboratory  records. Your quality control laboratory employee stated that he fabricated  laboratory data for untested finished drug products by manipulating electronic  laboratory records. For example, he changed the file names for test results of  previously tested drugs so that the file names appeared to reflect the results  of other lots of product. Your firm used this falsified laboratory data to  determine the strength of your OTC (b)(4) drug products. Your response stated  that your quality assurance manager instructed laboratory analysts to  manipulate, falsify, or fabricate data.
  我们的调查人员记录下了多个伪造实验室记录的例子。你们的QC实验室员工说他通过捏造电子实验记录为未检测的药品伪造实验室数据。例如,他更改了之前检测药品的检测结果的文件名,这样该文件名看起来反映的是另一些批次药品的检测结果。你们公司使用这些伪造的实验室数据来决定你们OTC  XX药品的剂量。你们在回复中声称说你们的QA经理指示分析员捏造、伪造或虚构数据。

  序号:8
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,计算机化系统,权限控制
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180202
  企业名称:韩国Cosmecca Korea Co., Ltd.
  缺陷项描述:
Your firm failed to exercise appropriate controls over computer or related  systems to assure that only authorized personnel institute changes in master  production and control records, or other records (21 CFR 211.68(b)).
  你公司未能对计算机和相关系统执行适当的控制以确保只有经过授权的人员才可以修改主生产和检测记录以及其它记录(21 CFR211.68(b))。
Laboratory equipment used to generate analytical data for release purposes  lacked restricted access. For example, analysts shared usernames and passwords,  and all users had administrator rights that permitted them to delete or modify  files in high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography  equipment. You had no mechanism to facilitate traceability of the individuals  who changed, adjusted, or modified data generated by computerized systems.
  用于生成放行所需的分析数据的实验室设备缺乏权限控制。例如,实验室共用用户名和密码,所有用户都具有管理员权限,均可以删除或修改HPLC和GC仪器中的文件。你们没有机制来审计跟踪何人修改、调整或改动了计算化系统生成的数据。
  序号:9
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180202
  企业名称:韩国Cosmecca Korea Co., Ltd.
  缺陷项描述:
Your firm’s quality control unit failed to review and approve all drug  product production and control records to determine compliance with all  established, approved written procedures before a batch is released or  distributed (21 CFR 211.192).
  你们公司的质量控制部门未能审核和批准所有药品生产和检测记录来确定产品在放行或销售之前是否符合所有既定的已批准的书面程序(21 CFR  211.192)。
Your OTC sunscreen drug product, (b)(4), contains (b)(4) active  ingredients: (b)(4).Your batch records for lot (b)(4)of this product included  concentration values for these active ingredients that did not match the data  found in your instruments. You used the inaccurate data reported in your batch  records to calculate potency results that were within specification, and you  relied on these inaccurate results to release your product. However, when we  used the instrument data instead of the results in your batch records to perform  the same calculations, we found that the lot was out-of-specification  (OOS)(super potent) for (b)(4) active ingredients. Your quality unit did not  identify this discrepancy prior to releasing this lot.
  你们的OTC防晒药品XX中含有XX活性成分:XX。你们XX批次的该药品的批记录包括有这些活性成分的浓度值,与在你们仪器中发现的数据并不相符。你们使用了不准确的数据报告在你们的批记录中用以计算得到符合质量标准的含量结果,你们依赖这些不准确的结果来放行你们的产品。但是,当我们使用仪器中的数据替代你们批记录中的数据来进行相同的计算时,我们发现该批次的XX活性成分是OOS(超过效价)。你们的质量部门在放行此批准时并未发现此分歧处。

  序号:10
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,捏造COA数据
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180118
  企业名称:日本Daito Kasei Kogyo Co., LTD., Okayama Factory
  缺陷项描述:
Failure to completely report test results on certificates of analysis.
  未在COA上完整报告检测结果
During the inspection, were viewed certificates of analysis (COA) for  batches of (b)(4) API that you manufactured and released between June 2011 and  February 2016. Your quality control unit signed these COA, which indicated that  all required tests had been conducted on these batches. However, you told our  investigator during the inspection that you signed these COA without having  conducted all the tests for which you reported results on these COA. For  example, your COA reported the results of identity and impurities tests that you  never conducted.
  在检查期间,我们审核了你们在2011年至2016年2月期间生产和放行的XX批次API的COA。你们的QC部门签署了这些COA,这表示对这些批次的所有所需检测均已执行。但是,你们在检查期间告诉我们调查人员说你们并未执行所有检测就获得了这些COA上的报告结果,并签署了这些COA。例如,你们的COA报告了鉴别结果和杂质检测,但你们根本未进行检测。
You falsified the COA you issued to your customers. Regulators and  customers rely on COA for accurate information about the quality and sourcing of  drugs and their components. Falsifying information about the quality of your  drugs on COA compromises supply chain accountability and traceability, and may  put consumers at risk.
  你们捏造了签发给客户的COA。法规监管人员和客户依赖于COA,来确认药品及其成分的质量准确信息和来源。在COA上捏造关于你们药品的质量信息使得供应链可靠性和可追溯性受到破坏,可能会将消费者置于风险下。

  序号:11
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,历史分析数据保存
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180109
  企业名称:中国湖南新合新
  缺陷项描述:
Failure to maintain complete data derived from all laboratory tests  conducted to ensure your API and intermediates comply with established  specifications and standards.
  未能保存所有为确保你们原料药和中间体符合既定标准而执行的实验室检测中生成的完整数据。
Your firm failed to retain and locate the analytical raw data for batches  (b)(4) and (b)(4) of (b)(4)base which you shipped to the United States in 2014.  In your response, you stated the “analytical data was not backed up.” You also  said that you transferred the instrument that generated the data to your (b)(4)  branch in 2015 and that the staff there deleted the data. It is essential to  retain raw data to ensure the ability to reconstruct cGMP activities and review  raw data, as necessary, for deviations and investigations.
  你们公司未保存你们在2014年销往美国的XX基XX批和XX批的分析原始数据。在你们的回复中,你们声称“分析数据没有备份”。你们还说你们将生成这些数据的仪器于2015年转移至你们XX分部,那儿的员工删除了这些数据。保存原始数据以确保可以还原cGMP活动和在必要时如偏差及调查时对原始数据的审核是基本要求。

  序号:12
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,批记录
  来源:FDA警告信
  发布日期:20180109
  企业名称:中国湖南新合新
  缺陷项描述:
Failure to prepare and use production and control records for each  intermediate and API batch.
  未为每个批次中间体和原料药制订并使用生产和检验批记录。
Your Quality Unit failed to retain and locate 20 of (b)(4) of your (b)(4)  base batch records, including but not limited to records for batches (b)(4) and  (b)(4).In your response, you stated the batch records “are not missing” and are  “archived properly.” Your response is inadequate because you did not provide  evidence, such as copies of the executed batch records.
  你们质量部门未能保存和找到20批你们的XX批产品的记录,包括但不仅限地XX批和XX批记录。在你们的回复中,你们声称批记录“并未丢失”,而是“妥善归档保存”了。你们的回复是不充分的,因为你们未提交证据,如已执行批记录的副本。
Additionally, your Quality Assurance department approved batch record  0220151203 and batch record0220151204 despite the inaccuracy of the weight of  raw materials added. In your response, you stated the operator “did not follow  the procedure” and did not recognize this as a deviation. You also stated  personnel had “inadequate awareness of deviations.” It is your responsibility to  ensure the accuracy and completeness of your batch records in order to establish  that your manufacturing process was followed and is reproducible.
  另外,你们的QA部分已批准了批记录0220151203和批记录0220151204,但所加入的原料重量是不准确的。在你们的回复中,你们声称操作工“未遵守程序”,并且不认为这是一个偏差。你们还声称人员“对偏差的了解不足”。你们有责任确保你们批记录的准确性和完整性,以证明你们遵守你们的生产工艺,并且工艺是可重复的。

  序号:13
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,记录保存
  来源:FDA 483
  发布日期:20180411
  企业名称:印度Alkem Laboratories
  缺陷项描述:
In addition, your firm failed to maintain and retain logbooks that are not  obsolete or outdated. For example, once completed your firm destroys logbooks  from the following areas: (b)(4) block warehouse, Housekeeping (b)(4)-Block QC,  (b)(4)-Block QA,(b)(4)-Block Manufacturing, (b)(4)-Block, QC, Warehouse, and  Production-(b)(4)Block.
  另外,你公司未维护和保存过期的台账记录。例如,一旦完成,你公司即把以下区域的台账记录销毁:XX车间仓库、库管XX车间QC、XX车间QA、XX车间生产、XX车间、QC、仓库和生产-XX车间。
As recent as 2018, the destruction of logbook examples include, but are not  limited to: Notification Record for Invalid Data, Line Clearance Checklist,  Preventive Maintenance, Instrument Logbooks, training records, cleaning check  lists.
  近至2018年,台账记录的销毁例子包括但不仅限于:无效数据通知记录、清场记录、预防性维护记录、仪器日志、培训记录、清洁检查清单。

  序号:14
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,网络存储数据的删除
  来源:FDA 483
  发布日期:20180411
  企业名称:印度Alkem Laboratories
  缺陷项描述:
A Your firm’s QC department deleted two-thousand one hundred one (2,101)  files since 1March 2018 on your network. These files names include, but are not  limited to: OOS, OOT, Incidents, Method Verification Reports, chromatographs,  calculations, and Stability Reports.
  你公司的QC部门自2018-03-01起从你们网络上删除了2101个文件。这些文件名称包括但不仅限于OOS、OOT、事件、方法确认报告、色谱、计算和稳定性报告。

  序号:15
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,实验室记录
  来源:FDA 483
  发布日期:20180411
  企业名称:印度Alkem Laboratories
  缺陷项描述:
Laboratory records do not include complete data derived from all tests,  examinations and assay necessary to assure compliance with established  specifications and standards. Electronic records are used, but they do not meet  requirements to ensure that they are trustworthy, reliable and generally  equivalent to paper records.
  实验室记录未包括为确保符合既定规格和标准而进行的所有测试、检查和含量中生成的完整数据。使用了电子记录,但它们无法确保其可信度、可靠度和等同于纸质记录的效力。

  序号:16
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,EXCEL表格不受控
  来源:FDA 483
  发布日期:20180411
  企业名称:印度Alkem Laboratories
  缺陷项描述:
A During the inspection, we observed two (2) different QC lab analyst  demonstrate the ability to change calculation function in the excel spreadsheet  used for finished product testing for the following:
  在检查期间,我们发现2个不同的QC分析员可以修改成品检测所用EXCEL表格中的计算功能如下:
(1) On 22 March 2018, we observed your QC Analyst use an uncontrolled excel  spreadsheet to calculate the Average, Standard Deviation, and %RSD values for  (b)(4) Tablets, Batch #(b)(4) product release testing. The use of this  spreadsheet is not mentioned in any written procedure when conducting (b)(4)  Product Release Testing. In addition, this excel spreadsheet is not saved or  printed. Therefore, the QC Reviewer is unable to verify these calculations are  correct and the correct formula was used.
  2018-03-22,我们发现你们QC分析员使用了一个未受控的EXCEL表格来计算XX片剂XX批号产品放行测试中的平均值、标准偏差和%RSD值。在所有书面程序中均未提及实施XX产品放行测试中使用此表格。另外,该EXCEL表格并未保存或打印。因此,QC复核人员无法确认这些计算是否正确,所用公式是否正确。
(2) On 23 March 2018, we observed the QC Reviewer use an uncontrolled excel  spreadsheet to verify the potency of (b)(4) working standard during the  Analytical Worksheet review for (b)(4) Tablets, Batch #(b)(4). The use of this  spreadsheet is not mentioned in any written procedure when conducting Analytical  Report reviews.
  2018-03-23,我们发现该QC审核人员在审核XX片剂XX批号的分析工作表过程中使用了未受控的EXCEL表格来核实XX工作标准的效价。在所有书面程序中均未提及在执行分析报告审核时使用此表格。
B. On 19 March 2018, we observed your QC Manager’s use an excel spreadsheet  to track quality functions, such as stability samples. This document is not  maintained through document control and there is no protection from data  manipulation, overwriting, erasing of data, or audit trails.
  2018-03-19,我们发现你们QC经理使用了一份EXCEL表格追踪质量函数,例如稳定性样品。此表格并未按照文件受控的原则进行维护,亦无防止数据篡改、改写、数据擦除或审计追踪的手段来进行保护。
C. On 19 March 2018, during the inspection, we observed two (2) (b)(4)  employees use an uncontrolled spreadsheet to calculate due dates used during the  manufacturing and packaging of drug products.
  2018-03-19,在检查期间,我们发现2个XX员工使用了未受控表格来计算药品生产和包装中所用的有效期。
(1) For example, but not limited to, the (b)(4) stage is to be completed  within (b)(4) initiating the compressed tablet stage. However, the dates used to  calculate these timeframes has not been validated. In addition, this spreadsheet  was no password protected.
  例子包括但不限于,XX步骤是在压片开始之后XX时间内完成。但是用于计算这些时间的日期并未经过验证。此外这些表格亦无密码保护。

  序号:17
  缺陷关键词:数据可靠性,原始数据 实验室记录
  来源:FDA 483
  发布日期:20180411
  企业名称:印度Alkem Laboratories
  缺陷项描述:
Established laboratory control mechanisms are not documented at the time of  performance.
  在进行实验室检测时未未按既定的实验室控制机制进行记录。
  Specifically, 具体来说
A. During our inspection of the QC laboratory on 19 March 2018, we observed  your QC Analyst entering data electronically into an excel spreadsheet, in the  absence of raw data. This same data was also entered into the 9M Stability Study  Logbook for (b)(4) Tablets (b)(4)mg, Batch #(b)(4), manufactured April 2017  (2months late).
  在2018-03-19我们对QC实验室检查期间,发现你们QC分析员将电子数据录入到一个EXCEL表格中,而没有原始数据。同样的数据亦被录入生产日期为2017年4月的XX片剂XX批号的9个月稳定性研究登记本(延迟2个月)。
B. On 23 March 2018, we observed a QC Executive reviewing an OOS/OOT  investigation for(b)(4) mg Tablets, Batch #(b)(4) where the stability and  scoring study were OOT. The employee had a pen for signing for the review, but  no checklist, paper, or workstation for recording errors. In the event of an  error the employee reported, they would notify the Section Head and Analyst, but  not document it.
  2018-03-23,我们发现一位QC经理正审核一份XX片剂XX批号的OOS/OOT调查,该稳定性和分级调查为OOT。该员工有一支钢笔用于审核签字,但并没有检查清单、纸或工作站来记录错误。在员工报告错误时,他们就口头通知分区领导和分析员,无纸质记录。
C. On 23 March 2018, we observed an Analytical Worksheet for Raw Materials  for (b)(4), Batch #(b)(4), did not contain any data for the UV conducted on 13  March 2018. The QC Analyst that conducted this analysis stated he did not  document these recordings on the Analytical Worksheet because his data packet  was removed by other Analysts without his knowledge.
  2018-03-23,我们发现一个XX产品XX批号原料的分析记录中并无2018-03-13所进行的UV检测数据。执行此检测的QC分析员声称他并未将这些记录在分析记录上,因为他的数据包在他不知情的情况下被别的分析员清除了。
D. On 22 March 2018, we observed a manufacturing employee entering tablets  weights non-contemporaneously during the manufacturing of (b)(4) tablets USP  (b)(4)mg, Batch # (b)(4) in the (b)(4) Block building.
  2018-03-22,我们发现一位生产员工在XX车间生产XX批次的XXmg USP规格的XX片剂时,未同步录入片剂重量。
免责声明:编辑对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立,不对所包含内容的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。仅作参考,并请各位自行承担全部责任。本文转载仅为交流学习,版权归原作者所有。如遇版权问题请联系小编删除。
微信图片_20180521100937.jpg
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-5-22 09:29:31 | 显示全部楼层
FDA发布的东西,版权也是FDA的。
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-22 09:41:14 | 显示全部楼层
Maric 发表于 2018-5-22 09:29
FDA发布的东西,版权也是FDA的。

我最后说了,版权归原作者所有,我只是分享一下感谢回复
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-5-22 10:37:50 | 显示全部楼层
学习了,谢谢
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-22 10:38:37 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2018-5-22 12:17:11 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-22 12:56:50 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

大师
发表于 2018-5-22 13:55:12 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢楼主的分享!
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-22 13:59:05 | 显示全部楼层
北重楼 发表于 2018-5-22 13:55
谢谢楼主的分享!

谢谢您的评论
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-5-22 17:30:14 | 显示全部楼层
了解一下!
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-22 17:39:41 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-5-25 14:52:24 | 显示全部楼层

谢谢分享!
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-25 15:28:30 | 显示全部楼层

不客气,就是最近发帖还发出错来了,无语
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-5-28 08:51:30 | 显示全部楼层
每天学习一点,进步一点,感谢分享
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-5-28 09:21:49 | 显示全部楼层
收藏了,谢谢
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-5-28 15:02:54 | 显示全部楼层
这一条有点扯:你们在回复中声称说你们的QA经理指示分析员捏造、伪造或虚构数据。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-5-28 15:02:57 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢楼主的分享,辛苦
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-28 15:44:16 | 显示全部楼层
酷哥 发表于 2018-5-28 08:51
每天学习一点,进步一点,感谢分享

谢谢,互相学习
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-28 15:44:56 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
 楼主| 发表于 2018-5-28 15:45:58 | 显示全部楼层
微艳思雨 发表于 2018-5-28 15:02
这一条有点扯:你们在回复中声称说你们的QA经理指示分析员捏造、伪造或虚构数据。

企业确实会有这方面情况出现,也是绝少数
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( (京)-非经营性-2014-0058 京ICP证150354号 京ICP备14042168号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-3-29 15:14

Powered by Discuz! X3.4运维单位:苏州豚鼠科技有限公司

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表