蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 4744|回复: 11
收起左侧

[行业动态] 仿制药巨头费森尤斯卡收购Akorn受后者数据完整性调查影响

[复制链接]
药士
发表于 2018-3-2 11:46:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
本帖最后由 beiwei5du 于 2018-3-2 11:51 编辑

Fresenius' $4.3B buyout of Akorn threatened by data integrity probeby Eric Palmer | Feb 27, 2018 8:39am



Akorn, which has a buyout offer from German drugmaker and dialysis specialist Fresenius, says it is investigating allegations that FDA data standards were violated in its drug development operation. (Image: Akorn)
Fresenius and Akorn say they are investigating whether Akorn violated FDA drug development standards, and that the results of the probe could scuttle the German's drugmaker's $4.3 billion deal to buy the U.S. generics maker.
In a statement late Monday, Akorn said the two companies, with the help of of outside consultants, are investigating “alleged breaches of FDA data integrity requirements relating to product development.” It said so far the investigation hasn’t found anything that would affect Akorn finances materially and that it “does not believe this investigation should affect the closing of the transaction with Fresenius.”

But in its own statement Frensenius said that its board would evaluate the results of the probe and “the transaction may be affected if the closing conditions under the merger agreement are not met.”
Both companies said there would be no further updates about the matter, but then, Reuters reported, CEO Stephan Sturm was more pointed in a press conference today saying, “If the allegations prove to be conclusive and are so material that they would impact our targets, then we will withdraw from the contract.”
The disclosures came as Fresenius today reportedQ4 sales that were up 8% in constant currencies to
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-2 13:04:53 | 显示全部楼层
上面说到的是研发数据完整性调查的问题:附上其GMP方面的最近两份483表,同时转发海螺研习社的一篇分析:
FDA483缺陷比去年少了一半,Akorn还会收到警告信吗?原创 2017-11-14 Rebecca 海螺研习社
2017年4月20到2017年4月26号,FDA对Akorn 在Decatur的工厂进行了为期一周的GMP检查。检查结束后,FDA给该公司发布了3条缺陷项的483 。实际上去年6月该工厂就被FDA核查过,去年是经过为期10天的检查,检查结束后审查员开具了6条观察项,分别和生产系统,质量系统和实验室控制系统相关。笔者经调研发现2016年483的检查分类属于OVI。因而今年4月对Akorn的检查实际上是对2016年检查的复检,距离去年检查相距不到一年。Akorn公司在收到去年的483之后申称自己已经改正了相关缺陷项,但是在这不到一年的时间里,又收到了新的483。同样是去年核查该工厂的检察官,今年483的内容倒是非常少,而且条款也非常简单。
(483网原文请参见:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/centersoffices/officeofglobalregulatoryoperationsandpolicy/ora/oraelectronicreadingroom/ucm580444.pdf)
缺陷1:质量控制部门的职责
和程序没有书面规定或者
执行的不够全面。
检察官在检查当天发现传送带上有颗粒脱落粘在清洗干净的准备进入罐装室的药瓶上。检察官当时就告知了无菌产品质量副总,并且对此事进行了讨论。但是最后发现公司并没有对此事进行纠正,而是继续将该产线的药瓶用于了后续产品的生产。

大家都知道无菌产品的生产对GMP的要求是最高的。按照GMP基本要求,已清洗的瓶子在传递到罐装间时是不允许粘有任何颗粒的。而且观察到了颗粒,显而易见的应按照质量程序发起偏差和调查,并进行纠正和采取预防措施。检察官发现了该问题并且在告知其质量副总的情况下,该异常情况没有按照GMP要求的流程进行处理反而是继续进行生产,反映该公司不仅质量管理系统有缺陷,管理层对产品质量的意识也很薄弱。
其实如果看过2016年FDA发给该公司的缺陷项就能发现该公司在实施质量体系方面很欠缺。包括但不限于质量文件不受控,偏差调查没有扩展到相关批次产品调查,偏差调查不彻底,根本原因都归结到人员失误上去了。
尽管去年FDA给该工厂的缺陷分类是OAI,但是看来经过一年的调整,该公司的质量水平并没有根本提高。
缺陷2产品生产,组装包装和holding线上使用的设备设计不合理,不能达到厂房既定运行目的,不利于设备的清洁和维护。
检察官提到某一房间有药瓶清洗机。该房间清洗的药瓶将通过传送带运输到罐装室。在检察官检查当天发现该传输带有颗粒脱落并且会粘在将运输到罐装间的洗净的药瓶上。检察官申称颗粒多到难以计数,并且大大小小颗粒都有,而且在传送带两端有堆积。检察官查找了自传送带安装时间到2017年4月20号已经有87批不同产品在该产线上生产。

这一条缺陷项和第一条是相关联的,也可以认为是对第一个发现项的深入挖掘。尽管这条缺陷项描述并不多,但是看起来现场应该是触目惊心的。遗憾的是审查官并没有描述该传送带是什么样的。按照道理,制药行业无菌药瓶传送带应该都是那种不锈钢惰性耐高温的材料,基本不会出现有颗粒脱落。这条缺陷的描述仿佛看到一个非制药行业的生产环境,让人疑惑这是一个制药公司吗?

翻阅2016年FDA给该公司的缺陷项里也多次提到产品有可见异物的重大偏差,但是该公司对这些偏差的调查最终都归结到人员失误,设备运行不正常或者说没有100%执行目检。

无论如何,这次审查官就可见异物的问题给该公司找到了根本原因之一,而且不仅找到了根本原因,将相关影响批次也全部罗列出来,该企业将如何对待该问题,也是值得期待的。

缺陷3无菌工艺验证不充分
FDA这次发布给Akorn工厂的483最大的一个特点就是特别简单,不仅表现在缺陷项条例很少,缺陷项的具体描述也很简单,尤其是这一条。缺陷项具体描述中仅提到公司没有完成培养基罐装实验,因为33%的培养基培养显示为阳性。至于公司在检测到33%无效后是否进行调查,是否有改正措施均未提到。这有点像我们在审查有些供应商时发现一个很严重的问题,当场决定停止审计不再执行后续审计一样,因为这个问题的严重性已经不用再去挖掘其背后的原因了。

目前FDA网站上还没有看到官方对这次缺陷结果的分类。至今年审查以来,过去6个月了,也没有看到发布相关的warning letter。从本次审计的缺陷项来看都是无菌产品生产过程中不能容忍的。2016年审计中反复提到产品可见异物和培养基罐装的缺陷恰恰是今年核查的重点。比较起来看,说明该公司在经历整改后,无论是其生产系统,还是质量系统都没有显著提高。有趣的是,查看Akorn公司该工厂,发现从09年开始每年都会被FDA审计到。当中也有极少次检查结果的分类为NAI。应该说生产无菌这种质量要求如此严格的产品,如此被FDA关注的公司,质量不至于这个水平才对。这次官方将会给Akron公司怎样的定性呢?笔者个人认为本次FDA不会让Decatur工厂通过GMP审查。具体结果怎样,我们还是拭目以待吧。

2016年FDA发给Akorn的483简要汇总:
一是违背书面生产程序要求的操作没有进行偏差记录和调查,尤其指出了培养基模拟罐装试验相关多处违背项;二是质量体系实施不到位,包括记录不受控;三是调查进行的不彻底,没有启动其他相关批次的调查;四是取样操作和文件要求不一致;五是取样计划设置不合理,不能保证中控和终产品的质量保证水平,无菌测试方法验证不彻底;六是影响中间体和成品质量的生产环节控制不到位,如100级洁净室HEPA过滤网验证和测试要求不能证明达到了既定要求。有兴趣了解去年Akron公司收到详细的483,可以通过下列网址进行查看。
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ab ... groom/ucm525311.pdf


Akorn 2017.04.pdf

1019.66 KB, 下载次数: 8

Akorn 2016.06.pdf

1.74 MB, 下载次数: 5

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-3-2 14:03:58 | 显示全部楼层
“谢谢分享”,“谢谢”,“看看”
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-2 14:38:56 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 beiwei5du 于 2018-3-2 14:49 编辑

这个或许可以参考!Deep Pockets | Does the FDA Get Tougher if the Owner Gets Richer?

By Barbara W. Unger| November 20th, 2017


|Biopharma / Pharma, cGMP Quality Assurance and FDA 483s, FDA Enforcement Trends, FDA-Regulated Industry, FDAzilla, Form FDA 483, MOST POPULAR, Pharma - Featured


by Barbara Unger, GMP Quality Expert, and GMP Regulatory Intelligence Editor-in-Chief
Acquisition of one pharmaceutical firm by another is preceded by due diligence efforts in many functional areas.  Let’s talk about activities in the GMP area.  Firms may not be able to fully rely on past inspections by the FDA to predict the extent of remediation that might be necessary in the manufacturing and testing of the firm’s products.  We provide five recent examples where the FDA appears to increase their enforcement intensity when an acquiring firm with perceived ‘deep-pockets’ enters the game.

Recently, the FDA posted a 17-page, 18-observation 483 issued to Claris Injectables Ltd, in Ahmedabad, India at the end of inspection on August 4, 2017.  Thomas Arista (National Expert Investigator) was one of the two investigators.  The previous inspection of this site for which a 483 is available was conducted in May 2015, and while many of the observations point out similar issues with shortcomings in environmental monitoring, the 2015 document was only 4-pages long.  Moreover, the 483 did not prompt additional enforcements such as a warning letter or import alert.  The FDA website does not currently identify any Claris sites under Import Alert 66-40 for failure to follow drug GMPs.  Claris sold its global generic injectables business to Baxter International on July 27, 2017; it’s not clear whether the sale includes this site.  If it does, this is likely the FDA’s message to Baxter that this site (and perhaps other Claris Injectables sites) need serious remediation and they expect it to be completed in a timely manner.  Baxter will be viewed as having the ‘deep-pockets’ necessary to fully address the problems.

This is not all that far-fetched.  The FDA continues to hold Pfizer accountable for shortcomings at Hospira sites…again the deeper pockets issue.  Pfizer completed the acquisition of Hospira in September 2015.  Hospira has been front and center in shortages of injectable drug products, as well as CGMP enforcement actions, at a variety of their manufacturing sites well before the purchase by Pfizer.  The warning letter issued to Hospira on February 2017 regarding their site in McPherson, Kansas was issued to the CEO of Pfizer and cites ‘similar CGMP violations at other [Hospira] facilities in your company’s network.’   The FDA proceeds to mention four warning letters issued to Hospira between 2010 and 2015 that identify CGMP deficiencies at five Hospira facilities.  The 20-page 483 mentioned in the warning letter identified 14 observations in several quality systems including a mention of combination products.  Pfizer seems to have underestimated the challenges posed by the purchase of Hospira.  Results for the Essential Health Unit (which includes Hospira) in 3Q2017 was down 11%.  FiercePharma reports that Read explained that when Pfizer acquired Hospira for $15 billion in 2015, his team was confident it would take only one to two years to integrate the manufacturing plants and resolve the majority of the supply chain issues. But despite its “robust action plan,” two years out, problems still confound.”  The FDA comments in the 2017 warning letter issued to the CEO of Pfizer shows their impatience and only slightly concealed frustration with remediation of long standing problems at Hospira.  In addition, this problematic inspection resulted in Complete Response Letters (CRLs) that cite manufacturing deficiencies including one for their own EPO biosimilar.  Obviously, Pfizer has far deeper pockets and more financial resources than Hospira even though they were a reasonably large firm when they separated from Abbott in 2004.

And, for another example, Amgen announced its acquisition of Mustafa Nevzat in April 2012 and completed the acquisition in June 2012.  Mustafa Nevzat was a privately held pharmaceutical firm in Turkey.  The FDA arrived in May 2012 for a routine inspection, issued a 26-page 483 to one of the two sites in Turkey, and then imposed an import alert for failure to comply with drug CGMPs which remains in effect today.  One of the investigators was Jose Cruz Gonzalez, a seasoned inspector with significant experience evaluating sites outside the US.

Stryker acquired Sage Products in February of 2016.  In July of 2017, Sage Products received a warning letter for apparently egregious lack of oversite of their contract manufacturer who was manufacturing drugs and car wax using the same equipment.  Needless to say, the contract manufacturer didn’t have cleaning validation.  Also, Sage was cited for failures in their approach to ensuring their oral drug products are not contaminated with objectional microorganisms including B. cepacia.  Stryker, with a market cap of approximately $58 billion paid just under $2.8 billion for Sage Products.

And, to add one final example, Mylan Inc. completed the acquisition of Agila Injectables from Strides Arcolab Limited on December 4, 2013 after announcing a definitive agreement to acquire them on February 27, 2013.  One of the Agila sites was inspected in June 2013 and this resulted in a warning letter in September 2013.  The 483 associated with the warning letter was 10 pages long and one of the investigators was Peter Baker who has been associated with many of the data integrity enforcement actions in India and China.  Note that both activities occurred after the announcement of the intended purchase.  In less than two years after the acquisition, three additional sites were associated with a warning letter dated August 6, 2015.  In this warning letter, the FDA states: “Furthermore, several violations are recurrent and long-standing. Although we acknowledge that the Agila facilities were acquired by Mylan recently, you were on notice of the violations in Warning Letter 320-13-26, dated September 9, 2013. Even without this Warning Letter, your corporate quality system should have detected and corrected the forgoing violations without FDA intervention.”  Ultimately Strides Shasun (yes, there was a name change) settled with Mylan to assist in covering the cost of remediation at the plants they sold to Mylan.

Bottom line, when a large company with seemingly significant financial resources acquires a smaller firm, the FDA appears to hold the acquiring company responsible to fix existing problems at the acquired firm and to do so in a timely manner.  Problems that may not have previously resulted in enforcement actions suddenly become important, expensive to remediate, and public.  The length of the enforcement related 483s in three of the cases mentioned above is a not so subtle clue that the FDA is attempting to obtain the undivided attention of the acquiring firm.  483s that are 17, 20, and 26 pages long are a clear sign of FDA displeasure at what they found upon inspection and rarely end painlessly for the firms that receive them.

Learn more about how FDAzilla can help you achieve your quality and inspection preparation goals: get 483s, Inspector Profiles, Enforcement Analytics, and GMP Regulatory Intelligence. Contact us if you ever have questions at sales@fdazilla.com.



回复

使用道具 举报

大师
发表于 2018-3-2 14:48:34 | 显示全部楼层
没管好子公司被连累到
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2018-3-2 15:06:23 | 显示全部楼层
感谢分享,下载学习一下
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-3-2 15:27:14 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵典型的屡教不改型的,FDA怎么这么温柔呢
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2018-3-2 15:31:03 | 显示全部楼层
子公司并购要慎重啊

点评

费森尤斯自身在这方面也有前车之鉴;为什么并购后仍然会出现该问题呢? Fresenius’ long drawn battle with data-integrity In 2008, Fresenius had acquired a 73 percent stake in India’s largest anti-  详情 回复 发表于 2018-3-4 11:15
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2018-3-2 15:31:08 | 显示全部楼层
FDA什么情况下会把483公布出来?基于信息自由方案申请吗?

点评

在FDA觉得有必要公开(比如高风险药品的483)或者有大量人员通过FOIA申请后,就会公开!  发表于 2018-3-2 15:37
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-4 11:15:12 | 显示全部楼层
一沙一叶 发表于 2018-3-2 15:31
子公司并购要慎重啊

费森尤斯自身在这方面也有前车之鉴;为什么并购后仍然会出现该问题呢?


Fresenius’ long drawn battle with data-integrity
In 2008, Fresenius had [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]acquired a 73 percent stake in India’s largest anti-cancer drug maker, Dabur Pharma. In 2013, its API manufacturing site [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]received a warning letter from the USFDA over data-integrity concerns. And once again, in December 2017, Fresenius’ API plant [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]received a warning letter for data-integrity concerns.
Investigators found employees had halted and invalidated HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) analyses [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]nearly 250 times when they believed the tests were going to end with out-of-specification (OOS) results.
Our view
Recent cases, such as [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]Daiichi’s catastrophic acquisition of Ranbaxy, [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]Teva’s problems with Rimsa in Mexico, [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]Baxter’s challenges with Claris and [color=rgb(2, 39, 182) !important]Mylan’s struggles with Agila tell us that for the pharma company that is making the acquisition, data integrity challenges lead to a sticky situation.
We view Fresenius’ independent investigation into data-integrity issues at Akorn in the backdrop of some of the M&A fiascos mentioned above.
Fresenius’ reliance on such an investigation goes on to prove how learnings on quality violations in manufacturing operations have taken centerstage in pharmaceutical corporate decision making.


回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2018-3-4 16:14:42 | 显示全部楼层
收购这活太复杂,谁都希望自己买的是基因泰克,可保不准买下来就成兰博西了
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-9-10 19:31

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表