蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 1700|回复: 4
收起左侧

[欧盟药事] 20140903 ECA新闻:欧盟发布期待已久的EU GMP指南第3章和第5章(Julia翻译)

[复制链接]
药士
发表于 2014-9-4 21:15:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x

GMP News
03/09/2014

EU Commission publishes long-awaited EU GMP Guide Chapters 3 and 5

欧盟发布EU GMP指南第3章和第5


The EU Commission had published its first draft of the chapter 3 "Premises and Equipment" and 5 "Production" for comments in early 2013 (see news from 04/12/2013). The content concerns the measures for avoiding cross-contamination and the regulation relative to which products have to be produced in dedicated facilities.

欧盟委员会在2013年很早时就公布了第3章“设施和设备”及第5章“生产”的第一版本草稿(参见2013412日新闻)。内容包括避免交叉污染的措施和必须在专用设施中生产的产品规定。

The mention of specific products for which a dedication is required - as provided in the currently valid version of chapter 3 - is missing in the now published version. The quality risk management approach is maintained. Also remaining are the exceptions where dedication is required - which are:

现行版本第3章中关于需要专用设施的特定产品在新公布的版本中没有了。质量风险管理方法留在文中。同时保留的还有需要专用设施的例外情况,如下:

  • The risk cannot be adequately controlled by operational and/ or technical measures, or
  • 风险不能由操作和/或技术措施充分控制,或
  • Scientific data from the toxicological evaluation does not support a controllable risk (e.g. allergenic potential from highly sensitising materials such as beta lactams) [Note: the draft version was mentioning missing thresholds], or
  • 毒理学评估的科学数据不支持可控风险(例如,高致敏物料如?内酰胺的致敏可能性)【注:草案中提到没有阈值】,或
  • Relevant residue limits, derived from the toxicological evaluation, cannot be satisfactorily determined by a validated analytical method.
  • 毒理学评估中获得的对应的残留限度不能由经过验证的分析方法来测定获得满意结果

But the main difference to last year's draft version is that there is no referencing for how the repeatedly mentioned toxicological assessment has to be done. The last draft for this purpose referenced the EMA Guideline (setting health based exposure limits for use in risk identification in the manufacture of different medicinal products in shared facilities), which is still in draft stage and is subject of controversial discussions. This of course creates new liberties. At the same time, though, it generates just as much uncertainty what such a toxicological assessment has to look like after all to be accepted by the authority. Chapter 5.20 provides some indications with regard to how the decision process has to be done risk-based and scientifically formal. Concrete information on the toxicological risk classification or derivation of the limit cannot be found here.

与去年的草稿主要的不同之处在于新版没有对于反复提到的毒理评估必须如何去做的引用。 该引用文献最后的草稿是EMA指南,该指南仍在起草阶段,其内容被广泛争论中。这样理所当然创造了新的自由度。同时,尽管这样的毒理评估会是什么样目前还完全不确定,不管怎么它将要被药监当局所接受。第5.20节提供了一些关于如何基于风险和科学方式做出决策。在这里找不到关于毒理风险分类和限度制订的具体信息。

To find the new Chapters valid from 1 March 2015 please see

201531日开始生效的新章节参见


回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2014-9-5 08:31:21 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢分享!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-9-5 09:35:13 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2014-9-5 09:37:47 | 显示全部楼层
收藏了,没准用得到
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2014-9-5 09:43:17 | 显示全部楼层
巴西木的更新总是很合乎我这个菜鸟的胃口啊{:soso_e113:}

点评

是啊,我都是转载Julia朋友翻译的内容  发表于 2014-9-5 09:51
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-9-26 11:44

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表