金币
UID225
帖子
主题
积分71710
注册时间2011-5-27
最后登录1970-1-1
听众
性别保密
|
欢迎您注册蒲公英
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册
x
本帖最后由 歪把子 于 2020-11-5 22:52 编辑
There are several published references for this from ICH Q2(R1)13 and
the respective chapters in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and United
States Pharmacopoeia (USP). However, the focus of these publications is
on validation of an analytical procedure that has been already developed.
Method development is far more important as it determines the overall
robustness or ruggedness of the analytical procedure receives scant attention
in these publications. However, this analytical world is changing,
following the publication in 2012 by Martin et al.14 there is a draft USP
<1220> on The Lifecycle Procedure Lifecycle15 issued for comment. This
will mean a move from chapters focused only on validation, verification
or transfer of a method to a life cycle approach to analytical chapters that
encompass development, validation, transfer and continual improvement
of analytical methods.
A life cycle approach to analytical procedures validation means that following
definition of an Analytical Target Profile (ATP) leads to good scientifically
sound method development that ends with the definition of
the procedure's design space. This now becomes important as changes to
a validated method within the validated design space would be deemed
to be validated per se. There will be a transition period where the old
approach is phased out while the new one is phased in. There is also a
revision of ICH Q2(R1) planned to ensure global harmonisation in this
area in the future.
但愿大家不再有那么多的顾虑,
一句在已验证的设计空间内,这就足够了。
谁知道呢,也许是五年以后的药典。
|
|