蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 4282|回复: 5
收起左侧

[计量校准] 什么是计量追溯性

[复制链接]
药士
发表于 2015-11-22 10:45:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
本帖最后由 beiwei5du 于 2015-11-22 10:55 编辑

What is Traceability?

Traceability can be defined as an unbroken record of documentation ("documentation traceability") or an unbroken chain of measurements and associated uncertainties ("metrological traceability"). As used here, the word "traceability" always means "metrological traceability."

The National Institute of Standards and Technology maintains the U.S. national standards for temperature.  In other countries, similar national standards laboratories perform the same function.

To establish and maintain traceability, the readings of a thermometer can be compared to a fixed-point temperature (e.g., ice-melting point) or a reference thermometer at a fixed temperature – this testing process is often called verification, performance validation or calibration.

Once a thermometer's accuracy is authenticated, it can serve as a reference to establish traceability for other thermometers.  This process can be continued, providing an unbroken chain of measurements from the final thermometer all the way back to the NIST standards.

The final measurement will have traceability to NIST standards if the following conditions are met:

  • An unbroken chain of measurements back to NIST standards is maintained.
  • Each step of the chain has known and documented uncertainties.
  • There is a quality system to ensure that the thermometers and associated measurement equipment maintain their measurement uncertainty (accuracy).

Example

The figure below shows a common traceability path.  With proper care, a thermometer can be used through many recalibration cycles beyond what is shown in the figure.



Measurement Assurance and Questions about Accuracy

Certain types of thermometers are quite fragile.  Unfortunately, there are often no visible signs of damage, especially for digital thermometers!  The only way to determine for certain that a thermometer's calibration results are still valid is to verify its performance.

For all of the measurements, an allowable tolerance or accuracy should be established.  In regulated applications, the tolerance of the thermometer may be specified; the user can select a tolerance based on the required application accuracy; or in some cases the manufacturer specification is adequate.  Thermometers that give results outside the allowed tolerance/application accuracy should be recalibrated or taken out of service.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. I have a "certified" thermometer that claims to be traceable to NIST. What does this mean?

There is no official definition of "certified."  Often, a certified thermometer has been tested against standards traceable to NIST, but the user is given less information on the certificate than is typical for a calibration report.  To be sure that the thermometer is truly traceable to NIST, we suggest asking the vendor if the certification followed a documented process, what was the measurement uncertainty, and how the reference standards are traceable to NIST.

2. Who has responsibility for ensuring that a measurement is traceable?

Ultimately, the user bears the responsibility of evaluating the traceability chain.  NIST does not monitor claims of traceability.  There are several factors relevant to evidence of traceability from the thermometer manufacturer/vendor:

  • Calibration methods and procedures should be openly documented.
  • Uncertainties of calibration should be clearly stated.
  • Traceability records should not be claimed to be private or proprietary knowledge.
  • Laboratory accreditation is not a guarantee of traceability, but accreditation does provide assurance that qualified assessors have looked at a laboratory's traceability procedures.

3. I have purchased a calibrated thermometer. How often must I have it tested to maintain traceability?

Initial testing/validation/calibration intervals should be based on manufacturer's recommendations or past experience with a type of thermometer (typically one year).  Intervals may be adjusted based on the historical calibration results of a particular thermometer.  If measurement history indicates significant drift, then recalibrate.  If check measurements indicate large and sudden changes, remove the thermometer from service.  

4. Can I do any of the calibrations myself?

You can perform the calibrations yourself if you meet all of the requirements for maintaining traceability and have the necessary laboratory equipment and skills.  Users can perform in-house performance checks, such as checks in an ice-melting point and steam point.  To be sure that you are performing in-house checks correctly, we recommend that users try out their performance checks on newly calibrated instruments that are known to be accurate.

5. My thermometer is traceable to the national standards of another country. Is that equivalent to traceability to NIST?

In some cases, legal or regulatory requirements will explicitly require traceability to NIST standards.  If there are no requirements of this type, then the standards of other countries likely are equivalent.  Many countries, including the United States, have signed an international Mutual Recognition Arrangement acknowledging the validity of each others' calibration certificates.  NIST also compares thermometers among nations to be sure that our standards are equivalent.  Records of the recognized calibration capabilities and of comparison results can be found on-line.



Mutual Recognition Arrangement.JPG
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-22 10:51:42 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 beiwei5du 于 2015-11-22 10:53 编辑

美国FDA认证,实际上中国官方的计量校准是否符合要求呢??看到一些文章有要求NIST traceability@石头968 @wts ,我看国内好像只有北京的一家可以进行相关被承认的NIST同等性互认的机构,那么我在部分仪表(比如温度计)的检查厂家出场校准合格报告时是否需要索取相应的北京这家机构的原校准报告呢,并且一级一级的相应报告以做到追溯性unbroken???

点评

应该是指最终追溯到符合NIST机构要求吧。 追溯可以是一级一级的向上追溯,不需要隔级追溯到高级别。  详情 回复 发表于 2015-11-22 20:47
回复

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
药徒
发表于 2015-11-22 17:04:47 | 显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复

使用道具 举报

药师
发表于 2015-11-22 20:47:44 | 显示全部楼层
beiwei5du 发表于 2015-11-22 10:51
美国FDA认证,实际上中国官方的计量校准是否符合要求呢??看到一些文章有要求NIST traceability@石头968 @ ...

应该是指最终追溯到符合NIST机构要求吧。
追溯可以是一级一级的向上追溯,不需要隔级追溯到高级别。
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-22 22:09:54 | 显示全部楼层
石头968 发表于 2015-11-22 20:47
应该是指最终追溯到符合NIST机构要求吧。
追溯可以是一级一级的向上追溯,不需要隔级追溯到高级别。

the user bears the responsibility of evaluating the traceability chain.  NIST does not monitor claims of traceability. 如果是这样的话,企业确实需要一级一级追溯到NIST的,那么至少企业在采购相关的设备时必须要求供应商提供相关的所有的一级一级documents以实现追溯职NIST,FDA在药企需要看到这种追溯性,而不是FDA去查一级一级供应商区追溯。

点评

企业最高标准器需要强制检定,这样的话,企业的计量器具内部校准就都可以追溯了。 买的计量器具,都应该有MC标志,也具有可追溯性。  详情 回复 发表于 2015-11-23 08:39
回复

使用道具 举报

药师
发表于 2015-11-23 08:39:22 | 显示全部楼层
beiwei5du 发表于 2015-11-22 22:09
the user bears the responsibility of evaluating the traceability chain.  NIST does not monitor cla ...

企业最高标准器需要强制检定,这样的话,企业的计量器具内部校准就都可以追溯了。
买的计量器具,都应该有MC标志,也具有可追溯性。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  增值电信业务经营许可证编号:京B2-20243455  互联网药品信息服务资格证书编号:(京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2025-9-26 21:38

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表